News
Want to donate?
May 2022
Robert Perkins, my father, the 2nd guy from the left above,
with the hat, runs the Army Pictorial Center. I
scanned/transcribed a photo album he received and posted it here as
a guest family. I'll take it down when he posts it on his
site.
Guest Family: Army Pictorial
Center
March 2022
Added a cast page. Every
person with a first and last name, from all 90 families, in one
place, making it easier to search for specific names.
Converted everything to a 5-column format to take less time
scrolling.
December 2021
4 batches of photos returned to their families, 32 so far.
18 new families posted, 26,856 new images, 72,483 images total.
Might pass 100 families and 100,000 photos with the next update.
COVID
Pre-COVID new photos came in from thrift stores and swapmeets, but
since COVID started I've been buying photo lots on Ebay in order to try
and minimize my exposure to other people and keep my family safe.
With photo lots from swapmeets and thrift stores I usually knew that
a particular batch of photos came from the same family. With bulk
photo lots bought by the pound from Ebay, usually from the same seller,
the photos are less tightly bound to a single family. Most of a
family's photos still show up in a single lot, but there are usually a
few photos from that family spread among the others.
The Purge
I haven't got around to doing a purge yet. Some of the new
photos were acquired less than 6 months ago, so if I do a purge, I'm
going to wait until at least June 18, 2022, 6 months from now.
July 2020
Of the 45,627 photos at Lost Photos, there are 27,558 with years
written on them. Here is a chart of when the photos were
taken:
9 batches of photos returned to their families, 28 so far.
39 new families posted, 28,801 new images, 45,627 images total.
Family 34 is up.
1,378 images in this set
It's the Whitsett family.
|
Family 35 is up.
3,151 images in this set.
|
Family 36 is up.
328 images in this set
It's the Johnston / Reeves family.
|
Family 37 is up.
128 images in this set.
|
Family 38 is up.
2,502 images in this set.
|
Family 39 is up.
883 images in this set.
|
Family 40 is up. 222 images in this set.
|
Family 41 is up. 316 images in this set.
|
Family 42 is up. 210 images in this set.
|
Family 43 is up. 974 images in this set.
|
Family 44 is up. 3,283 images in this set.
|
Family 45 is up. 179 images in this set.
|
Family 46 is up. 303 images in this set.
|
Family 47 is up. 93 images in this set. It's the Bergman / Gregory / Shuptrine family.
|
Family 48 is up. 44 images in this set.
|
Family 49 is up. 667 images in this set.
|
Family 50 is up. 136 images in this set. It's a freemason family.
|
Family 51 is up. 314 images in this set.
|
Family 52 is up. 538 images in this set.
|
Family 53 is up. 1,118 images in this set.
|
Family 54 is up. 219 images in this set.
|
Family 55 is up. 813 images in this set.
|
Family 56 is up. 151 images in this set.
|
Family 57 is up. 19 images in this set.
|
Family 58 is up. 91 images in this set.
|
Family 59 is up. 3,774 images in this set. It's the work of Dr. Elinor S Benes.
|
Family 60 is up. 58 images in this set.
|
Family 61 is up. 27 images in this set. It's a bar mitzvah for Scott William Crane.
|
Family 62 is up. 126 images in this set. This lady liked her cats.
|
Family 63 is up. 179 images in this set.
|
Family 64 is up. 805 images in this set. It's the Dudley family.
|
Family 65 is up. 183 images in this set. It's the Dulinski family.
|
Family 66 is up. 2,140 images in this set. It's the Kohl / Kreutz family.
|
Family 67 is up. 404 images in this set.
|
Family 68 is up. 1,121 images in this set.
|
Family 69 is up. 253 images in this set.
|
Family 70 is up. 158 images in this set.
|
Family 71 is up. 159 images in this set.
|
Family 72 is up. 1,354 images in this set. It's the Winters family.
|
|
The Purge
At or just after the 5 year anniversary for Lost Photos, which will
be in October 2021, fifteen months from now, there will probably be
a purge. Storage space is limited now and will be even tighter
in October 2021 if photos continue to accumulate at the same rate.
All existing material (photos, documents, ID's, etc.) could be
placed in a storage unit, but that would introduce a new, ongoing
financial drain and a risk of all of the material being lost if Lost
Photos goes out of business or forgets to pay the storage unit.
This is unlikely, but since this is how most of the photos came to
Lost Photos in the first place- people losing their storage units,
contents went to auction, Lost Photos bought the photos- it would be
tempting fate to put the photos back in a similiar situation.
Material obtained in the 6 months before the purge, April 2021 to
October 2021, will not be destroyed / disposed of / sold until a
possible purge at the 10 year mark. This will make sure that
material obtained shortly before the 5 year purge will be maintained
long enough to give each family a chance to find their material or
be found and contacted by Lost Photos.
If / when the purge happens, here is what will happen to these 4
categories of material:
1) Slides will be combined into one group lot and sold through
Ebay, Amazon, or some other means. All proceeds would go into
Lost Photos' account, not the personal account of any of its board
members.
2) Print photos from around 1930 and earlier will be combined
into another group lot and sold through Ebay, Amazon, or some other
means. All proceeds would go into Lost Photos' account, not
the personal account of any of its board members.
3) Print photos after about 1930 and all negatives will be
disposed of.
4) Any other material containing personally identifiable
information (PII), including but not limited to driver's licenses,
social security cards, passports, and birth certificates will be
destroyed (micro-cut shredded) and then disposed of.
January 2020
Many thanks to Epson for their
donation of an FF-680W scanner.
While I am happy with my old scanner, it accumulated enough nicks
and scratches on the scanning bed to start becoming noticeable in
the scanned images. The new Epson FF-680W is a sheet-fed scanner
where I can put a bunch of photos in the input tray, like paper in a
printer, so I don't have to place each printed photo on a scanning
bed. A happy surprise- I did not realize before it arrived, but the
Epson FF-680W is a USB 3 scanner, so file transfer is much faster
than my old USB 2 scanner.
Here's the product page for the Epson FF-680W.
November 2019
4 batches of photos returned to their families, 19 total so
far.
11 new families posted, 3,499 new images, 16,826 images total.
Family 23 is up. 182
images in this set.
|
Family 24 is up. 699
images in this set.
|
Family 25 is up. 29
images in this set.
|
Family 26 is up. 53
images in this set.
|
Family 27 is up. 60
images in this set.
|
Family 28 is up. 28
images in this set. Coincidence.
|
Family 29 is up. 128
images in this set.
|
Family 30 is up. 40
images in this set.
|
Family 31 is up. 974
images in this set. WWII re-enactor / vehicle rebuilder.
|
Family 32 is up. 219
images in this set.
|
Family 33 is up. 1,087
images in this set.
|
|
|
|
|
October 2019
Policy Update:
I’m starting to run into batches of photos and documents that fall
into a category I did not expect to have- people who acknowledge
that a batch of photos is from their family, but who either do not
want the photos or who don’t respond or respond very slowly,
multiple days between responses.
Lost Photos’ mission statement is “To collect and preserve
historical photos and other media, make the material available to
the public online at no cost, and return the material to surviving
family members on request.”
If someone refuses their photos, I will throw the photos away
because that is their request.
If someone claims a batch of photos as theirs, but refuse to say
what they want done with the photos, they are not requesting the
return of their photos and the photos can’t be scanned and posted to
the web site. Saying they want the photos, but refusing to say how /
where they want the photos returned ('I want the photos but I won’t
tell you where to send them / drop them off”) will be considered a
refusal to say what they want done with the photos. Because both
paths (return vs. scan and post) to deal with the photos are
blocked, after a point in time no less than 2 weeks after they claim
a batch of photos as theirs, the photos will be thrown away, with a
minimum of 2 weeks warning to them before that happens.
If someone claims a batch of photos as theirs, wants the photos, and
maintains active contact with Lost Photos, and there is a logistics
issue (grandma died in California, left multiple tote boxes there,
rest of family is on the east coast, and neither Lost Photos nor the
family can afford shipping), then the photos will not be thrown away
and will be saved until shipment can be arranged.
Regarding the mission statement, it says that photos will be visible
to the public for free, but it does not say that photos will be
returned to their family for free. This was an error on my part- I
meant that photos will be visible to the public for free, and that
photos will be returned to their families for free. There is an
exception I should clarify here- the additional cost of returning
the photos to the families (gas for local deliveries, shipping for
deliveries outside of southern California) will be covered by Lost
Photos, unless that cost is beyond Lost Photos’ ability to cover
(ex: multiple tote boxes shipped to the other side of the country).
If there is a shipping charge that can’t be covered by Lost Photos
and the family pays for shipping, only the cost of shipping will be
paid by the family. The cost to Lost Photos of acquiring the photos
will never be paid by the family.
September 2019
Update: Several new Sets of photos. Returned 3 sets to
their families, 15 sets total. Lots of scanning, cropping,
color correcting.
April 2019
Family 22 is up. It's
the Doull / Tothill / Redman / Bailey family. 1,535 images in
this set.
March 2019
Donations page up and running at Crowdrise.
January 2019
Family 21 is up again, now
with 1,989 images in this set. I thought the first packet of
photos, 343 of them, was a separate family, in a larger box with
packets of photos from other families. I was wrong. This
is probably still a multi-family group of photos, but there are
photos from the same family in different packets.
January 2019
Family 21 is up. It's
the Hoiten family. 343 images in this set.
July 2018
Just posted Family 20, which appears to be the Caulfield / Ritter /
Southard family. 619 images in this set.
May 2018
Scanned all of slides so I could put them in storage. About 16,000
slides when I get around to formatting and posting them.
Just posted family 19, a multi-family batch of photos. Found one
real-life family, whose photos won't be posted. Their photos will be
returned to them for free.
Family 19 is split into two pages.
Family 19 has photos I couldn't separate into sub-groups.
Family 19-A has photos I could
separate into sub-groups. 2,585 images in this set.
August 2017
I collect photos, then try to find living family members and return the
photos, then (if I can't find living family members) scan and post the
photos. I've been collecting new batches of photos these last few
months. Currently closer to 30,000 new photos, at max capacity in my
work area, so it's time to shift to scanning.
Just posted family 18, the family of Dr Alfred Guido Randolph Schloesser,
whose daughter (Daisy Schloesser) married Eric E Eastman (student and
instructor at Iowa State College's agronomy department in the 1910's.
1,344 images in this set.
Family 18
April 2017
5 batches of photos (total) returned to surviving friends / family members. Some returned in person, some returned by mail (no charge).
Accumulating photos faster than I can process them. Currently feeding the slide scanner. Should be somewhere in the neighborhood of 15,000 to 20,000 new images if (when!) I get caught up.
December, 2016
Acquired a batch of paperwork and a few photos about a gentleman who served in a bomber group in WWII. Paperwork included assorted WWII military forms, post-war VA paperwork, stories about his life, medical paperwork up to the 2000's, DOB, and SSN. His daughter was mentioned in the genealogy section, with enough information and a name that was unusual enough to identify this surviving family member. The daughter was contacted and all of her father's paperwork and photos were returned to her at no cost.
|